It seems that everywhere you look these days; people are
coming up with more creative ways to get their highs. From Volcano vaporizers
to light cigarettes, getting your nicotine buzz has become the technological
grail. One of the newest is the
electronic cigarette, or e-cigarette.
But what exactly is this thing?
The easy answer is to say that, unlike a
cigarette, the e-cigarette is actually constructed primarily from a
stainless-steel tube. To be more
precise, when someone "puffs" on an e-cigarette, a computerized
sensor feels the drop in pressure and activates both an internal heating
element as well as the signature "red glow" LED at the tip. The heating element then vaporizes a liquid
solution that contains, among other things, varying levels of nicotine.
As the makers of these things really like to tout upon,
these e-cigarettes can be smoked anywhere because they are not technically
cigarettes. Thus, although I hate to see
it, there are kiosks full of these things popping up in malls everywhere. The employees of these carts are encouraged to
"smoke" these e-cigarettes inside of the malls where they work to
show the shoppers that it’s okay to smoke inside. Personally, I felt nauseated by the sight and
wondered how the mall owners allow such filth.
According to the Food and Drug
Administration, e-cigarettes are considered "new drugs," which means
that they require approval from the FDA.
This means that their safety needs to be backed by scientific data. Although
the companies that sell these e-cigarettes claim that they are safe, they have
not backed up their claims with any data showing studies on humans. And despite the FDA saying that these
products are still waiting on their approval and cannot be sold, stores are
popping up like candy, and there has been no movement to stop their sale. This has prompted the FDA to sue for the
power to regulate these drug devices.
Does this raise a giant red flag for anyone else but me? I mean, if these e-cigarettes are as safe as
the companies claim they are, why are they forcing the FDA to sue to get the
power to regulate them?
These e-cigarettes also present a new legal issue. In states where cigarette smoking is banned
in restaurants, workplaces and within 20 feet of many public places, where exactly
is an e-cigarette allowed? The makers of
the e-cigarettes claim that they can be smoked anywhere because they are not
defined as a cigarette, but as the FDA has found, these devices still deliver
chemicals that are quite toxic to humans.
In response, some states, like California,
are pursuing legislation that would halt the sale of e-cigarettes until the
FDA has the power to regulate them.
So, what’s the best bet?
Get your toxins the traditional way and light up, or get new and
exciting chemicals and light up your LED…
Why would you feel "nauseated" when it's not a cigarette and there is no smoke? Why is it considered filth? Just out of curiousity, do you drink coffee or soda? If so, I would question whether you may have an addiction and if so why are you allowed to do this in public? Oh that's right...because you are only affecting yourself just like someone using an electronic cigarette. Maybe you should do a little research before spouting off on a topic you are not fully educated on.
So are you suggesting that rather than provide an alternative to smokers that cannot quit they should just continue using a legal drug that has been proven to kill?
And to answer your question regarding the safety of the electronic cigarette and the FDA. Have you ever thought about the general politics involved and the interest and party groups that have the ability to influence (Philip Morris, etc...)?
I'm not sure who you are but I am sure you under qualified for a position that allows you to write editorials such as this. From the way it appears I'm probably the only one that has read this post so you're not doing any damage anyway.
By the way, are you aware that the PG that seems to have everyone up in arms is also utilized in foods, medications, cosmetics, etc...?
Posted by: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000232680822 | November 25, 2009 at 03:38 PM
You are possibly the dumbest blogger I have ever read. Do some frickin homework befiore you write something out of your ass next time.
Just THINK ONE SECOND.
How many chemicals are in regular cigarettes - TRY 4000. How many people die from Cigarette second hand smoke ? How filthy is that habit really ?
Now just THINK about comparing the above facts and compare them to the e cigarette produt you just slammed.
Posted by: Chuck Holroyd | December 27, 2009 at 10:35 PM
I actually love the e cig product. It's mostly propaganda out there that is destroying the credibility of suppliers.
Posted by: Johnny Shmoe | February 08, 2010 at 05:27 PM
I think smoking electronic cigarettes is a pretty good solution. It might not be perfect, but it is far better than smoking tobacco cigarettes and is more effective to help people quit smoking completely
Posted by: Ralgee | October 31, 2010 at 03:55 AM
New death sticks? Really? So aqueous glycerin, food flavoring and nicotine are deadly? If this is the case, what are we allowed to ingest, that is considered healthy. The last I looked food flavoring and food grade glycerin were not considered deadly. I also want to comment on nicotine. Pharmaceutical grade nicotine I’ll admit is a drug. But nicotine has a bad reputation because it’s associated with tobacco. Well e-cigarette users are NOT smoking it….. at all. If caffeine was in tobacco, I guess it would be an awful drug that no one should use. But say goodbye to your coffee, pop and chocolate. If you want to convince me, tell me how nicotine is so much worse than caffeine. Good luck.
Posted by: Paul Westphalen | July 29, 2011 at 03:59 PM